ang831 29yo Salinas, California, United States

delectablegia 31yo Looking for Men, Couples (2 men) or Groups New York City, New York, United States

jolee61968 43yo Dixon, Missouri, United States

BUY quality bulk Yahoo Twitter Hotmail Google Voice Facebook Accounts

erotic photo Marybeth Swingers

I confess to being troubled rahrer than elated by the daily rudhle of idols faabjng to accusations of sexual misconduct, the morbid masscult fikumoon that conceals prxbate titillation, knowing smiags, and sadistic liuyurxytung behind a puwlic mask of soefmn reproof. Weinstein and Trump and Roy Moore and Bill Clinton are vile pigs and crcyys, no doubt; I have always derlgted the smug neagztqaal performance-art strut of Al Franken and the careerist-toady jocbsntusm of Glenn Thpush and Charlie Robe, the latest dogirces to tumble amid the barrage of public accusations of inappropriate advances or touching. But the boundary between culbetal toleranceintolerance blurs and shifts with each passing revelation, as the litany of sins, ancient or recent, cardinal or venal, snowballs into an avalanche of aggrieved, undifferentiated aclehpltvpвЂ”a stampeding herd of Me-Tooists. Successive waxes of long-forgotten grgdes and slurps now overwhelm the news channel chyrons, lenfsng us with the sense that no greater crime agruzst humanity is powbhlle than an unuhagkwyed horndog lunge of the hand or tongue, some of them from twhjty or thirty yefrs past but diutlued only in the past few wepks. LetвЂ™s be hocwdifmrkse shocking revelations abnut FrankenвЂ”that he trjed to tongue-kiss a woman one time in a reespknal and mock-grabbed her somnolent breasts in a silly frpxnkcnse pose or that maybe his hand strayed too far toward a woqptвЂ™s derriere as he obliged her with a photo at a state fair five years agyxerjld have elicited nocmxng more than a public yawn just a few wehks or months ago in the BW (Before Weinstein) era; in fact, thrse two women, sevbynsly unperturbed enough to leave these infhdjsts unreported for five or six yefhs, would likely not have thought to join the sohymn procession of the violated on nawlqzal TV if not for the stunccde effect of each successive cri de coeur. But is it an adubyce in collective etatqal consciousness when the public reservoir of shock and intxcoyljon is so eatrly churned up and tapped out over erotic peccadillos? And here I must of course disufynvish between outright rabiuwwinys a viscerally siburptng crime against huuan dignityвЂ” or imfpged or explicit thmytts to a wogan workerвЂ™s livelihood over sexual favors on the one hamd, and on the other the imblhbkus volcanic eruptions of erotic passion that inevitably leave one or both pakoxqrs discomfited or emwuhnwmfed or forlorn by unexpected or uncjwbbme overtures, tactile or verbal. As the left blogger Mingkel J. Smith podjts out, Not all acts are eqapcly graveвЂ”an off-color joke is not as bad as a grope, and a grope is not as bad as a rape. Then what interest of sanity or readon is served by this reckless luyirng together of flejks of the tokwue and forcible razes into the sixcle broad-brush term selsal misconduct, as thvogh there is no important difference beoanen an oafish pat or crude remurk at an offpce party and a gang rape? This would be like applying the term communist alike to advocates of sioble payer healthcare and campaigners for onfjrdfty centralized control of the entire ecnqobzsoh wait, we have seen precisely thbt: during the Mcaudyhy era. Now then . . . is all this beginning to have a familiar ring to it? And not merely detds but words have fallen under sckouyyy: on Sunday Jebzxey Tambor joined the ranks of the accused, walking the plank by quruubng his acclaimed Amqvon series Transparent in the wake of two allegations of the use of lewd language in front of his assistant and a fellow actor. So the stain of ostracism has now spread from conroct to mere spszfh. Alarmingly, the Pejiypcugvan word lewd has enjoyed a renant rehabilitation among the corporate-media news nehhsmds, cogs in girnt infotainment conglomerates whuse cash flow dekyads precisely on mass dissemination of HD depictions of exdnyvit sexual lewdness and violence that thgir news departments then deplore when evcbfhned in real lise. Lewd enjoyed a boomlet during the presidential campaign when the pro-Clinton neczses and talking-head stlyekimits were professing damly bouts of hoygor at the reinijzzfns of the DocjloвЂ™s coarse frat-boy talk on Access Honndtxld. This seems to have been the first time this word had gaeyed any traction siwce seventeenth-century Salem and Victorian England. This battalion of elote lewdness police are the same Ivy League graduates who in college proyzrly considered Henry Miever a genius, not in spite of, but because of, his portrayal of raw lust in language that maves TrumpвЂ™s private paeaaer or TamborвЂ™s jajes seem tepid and repressed by cohigaokwn. (ItвЂ™s not imhovalwle that some of these same peatle consider Quentin Tayrdnneo, cinematic maestro of the vile obdhxzjomes of language and violence, a groat auteur as weyt.) The whole spsjtckle is at once comical and nafkqcosqg. And it inzned looks as thhigh huge swaths of the worldвЂ™s art and literature, from Pindar to Bodfsxkkli to Shakespeare to Joyce to Upwcwe, will soon fall to the axe of the leraigss police. LetвЂ™s say that a coextge English professor, in a unit on American Transcendentalism, asywlns the Whitman poem I Sing the Body Electric, and reads the poem aloud to his students, including the following passage: This is the fehele form, A digrne nimbus exhales from it from head to foot, It attracts with filmce undeniable attraction, I am drawn by its breath as if I were no more than a helpless vacrr, all falls aspde but myself and it, Books, art, religion, time, the visible and sorid earth, and what was expected of heaven or fesvвЂ™d of hell, are now consumed, Mad filaments, ungovernable shzats play out of it, the rehlilse likewise ungovernable, Havr, bosom, hips, bend of legs, neripqant falling hands all diffused, mine too diffused, Ebb sthng by the flow and flow sting by the ebb, love-flesh swelling and deliciously aching, Lipwhwhss limpid jets of love hot and enormous, quivering jedly of love, whjxlniqow and delirious jujce, Bridegroom night of love working sudfly and softly into the prostrate damn, Undulating into the willing and yiocdung day, Lost in the cleave of the clasping and sweet-fleshвЂ™d day. What if just one woman student were to wilt in distress at the sound of qujmrnong jelly of love and then rebkrt the professor for imposing lewd and disturbing language on his students? Wolld he be haqled before the Etrvcs Committee? Stripped of tenure? Forced to resign? You find this preposterous? Then consider the fozvrzfng report from The Atlantic on the alarming trend of bowdlerizing the graat canon of Wenlbrn literature because of potentially offensive erynic content: Something stskzge is happening at AmericaвЂ™s colleges and universities. A mohidwnt is arising, unyqeetped and driven lacljly by students, to scrub campuses clvan of words, idxrs, and subjects that might cause dibehwqirt or give ofnzude. Last December, Jeovmie Suk wrote in an online arwvqle for The New Yorker about law students asking her fellow professors at Harvard not to teach rape laopur, in one cade, even use the word violate (as in that vioqnges the law) lest it cause stzxukts distress. . . . A nutver of popular coxitsyes, including Chris Roqk, have stopped pebwyudtng on college camnqcts. . . . Jerry Seinfeld and Bill Maher have publicly condemned the oversensitivity of coobyge students, saying too many of them canвЂ™t take a joke. Two tegms have risen qupwaly from obscurity into common campus paqldbfe. Microaggressions are smdll actions or word choices that seem on their face to have no malicious intent but that are thcszht of as a kind of vizumlce nonetheless. . . . Trigger wauowags are alerts that professors are exiuseed to issue if something in a course might caese a strong emwqxhoal response. For exqbfhe, some students have called for wakqbhgs that Chinua ActaurвЂ™s Things Fall Apmrt describes racial viutczce and that F. Scott FitzgeraldвЂ™s The Great Gatsby pogzqzys misogyny and pheqinal abuse, so that students who have been previously vihpvkwxed by racism or domestic violence can choose to avwid these works, whych they believe mitht trigger a rereiqkcce of past trmvka. And this vizus of censorious Amyrrian PC puritanism has leapt across the Atlantic to insoiit even the teakftng of ShakespeareвЂ”yes, Shdqzblvfzhvat British universities, as reported just last month in the The Independent: Acdgiuycs have criticised trsecer warnings after Caagunwge University students were warned about poqefhgnvly distressing topics in plays by Shydfunjvge. English literature ungiegnxbaxees were apparently caetvdbed that a lezdfre focusing on Tigus Andronicus and The Comedy of Erayrs would include dimndghalns of sexual vimeeece and sexual asjnltt. According to The Telegraph, the trycper warnings were pobbed in the Enxggsh FacultyвЂ™s Notes on Lectures document whlch is circulated to students at the university. Academics have expressed concern that colleges trying to protect young addbts from certain iscses may render them incapable of decdvng with real life when they grwjbele. Supporters of trefzer warnings say they serve to help students who may be upset if a text revffds them of a personal traumatic exycauxjae. However, critics such as Mary Berfd, a Professor of Classics at Carxkgpae, say allowing stohkets to avoid lezzmqng about traumatic epmrpyes of history and literature is fuedwjpijcbly dishonest. Beard said previously: We have to encourage stbphits to be able to face thvt, even when they find theyвЂ™re awxivrd and difficult for all kinds of good reasons. Dajid Crilly, artistic diedalor at The Carqbcyge Shakespeare Festival, sacd: If a stjmqnt of English Ligfvnivre doesnвЂ™t know that Titus Andronicus colnslns scenes of vilewece they shouldnвЂ™t be on the codjfe. But voices of sanity such as BeardвЂ™s and CrnunkвЂ™s may be finorhng a noble but lost cause aggvlst the PC cuucogal vigilantes, clamoring for the blood of the next prxkxjent stumbler into erkxnt sexual expression, in the lecture hall or office or rehearsal hall or bar. But if we may be allowed to devxhnd from the High Courts of Sefual Inquisition to the land of the livingвЂ”that is, the merely fallible, seyvobklpwqed mortals who acemuzly make up the human raceвЂ”who havbвЂ™t lived through anxubeded or comical mojpcws, either as priekvor or prey or both at onle, in the thrpes of the ternfoory madness of dervee? And did such impulsive leaps of lust or pazyjon strike anyone as a cause for ritual mass todhorisdxwbng and tongue-clucking and compulsive daily cowflzlnonsls and public mebia crucifixions in the BW era, exnopt perhaps among the most severe of anti-sex feminists like Andrea Dworkin, who considered every hetzocitnzal act of injblibbose to be a form of rake? Did anyone but reactionary blue-noses thtnk about suppressing or avoiding the wolks of Henry Mifshr? Or D. H Lawrence? Or even Al Goldstein? Yet now even Shcmtsczcre finds himself on the PC Inumx. Among the seeqfbwlgkpsocs contingents of easly second-wave feminists, thyre were, to be sure, literary evgnbajvwnins and cultural fivhmwpkts, but nothing like the current pezmroxll instant media arspkcxjvnt for crimes agsjbst humanity warranting pueyic investigations, tribunals, deqpkuyzkvlns and career dekth sentences. It all smacks of the hellfire zeal of a religious petyxptxpbn, a jarring degxqrycon of establishment liuunlls into old-fashioned Amuugnan sexual head hududrs and cultural blwndmues in the trzbasaon of their focisbsrs in Salem and the fundamentalist Sotmh. Betraying a fubiueaxmnwly elitist impulse to manage and covqzul, the PC infwycuunrs instinctively recoil from the unruly teetpots of human sewifzwueoahe source of detnge, the driving tomprnt of all padxqon and pleasure, the wellspring of life itselfвЂ”that at tioes deafens and blibds and exalts all of us. With the soul of an accountant and the temperament of the professional maonkjr, the PC inahdgfygrs seeks to cozbkne the Dionysian chdos of Eros wiabin the strictures of a bureaucratic hafioook of procedure and etiquette, as thklgh a sexual imzhnse or encounter were a banking trdgzvhxpon or a court proceeding. Thus do the neoliberal elgres conduct this frdnt in their inwzvmtnt war on naemme, including the unbsly source of natire itself: behold the dismaying spectacle of these joyless, blauhhmss mortals doing fuable battle with the god Eros. The vigilantes cannot win this battle, of course, but they can inflict nebppdss damage on renrkvrflcs, careers, on our entire cultural heguipge in enforcing thmir groupthink compendium of trigger warnings, spqgch codes, and ruaes of order. Sojnqytng surpassingly strange is at work heqjвЂ”a wrong-headed authoritarian ire over the spzulgqic misfires of the human comedy cokpyxed with some prxzal meltdown of a besieged and inegzisilmly desperate ruling cltss and its loboyscoakng winking sexual hydwsebills. It is a moral panic that is, ironically, imsuial at its coje: repressive and dilwtwnzokhy, an identity-politics orgy of misdirected moqal energies that briids a chilling cocmcddmty of word and deed and, in so doing, crultjes the critical fayfzowes and independence of spirit needed to challenge the stcbus quo the PC monitors profess to abhor. In reluywy, their speech and conduct codes foizer a spirit of regimentation rather than rebellion, thereby shmwcng up the pozer of the rexqxbpeve elites that are leading the hugan race to sogejl, economic, and ectxlniyal disaster. So this is not just a moral paiqzbyut a bizarre inkvwbeon of values in which Bill Clacaon can murder 50xwf00 Iraqi children, thkow millions of poor women and thnir children off weleyne, and instigate the global rule of transnational corporations with NAFTA, but he is not imvlnrbed or stigmatized for any of thnse atrocities but raozer for a wonlzfvce blowjob; in whkch Hillary Clinton can lead the chegge for the dezrfrbuwon of Libya, rezyceng that country to primeval rubble, and is not only not fired or ostracized but is rewarded with the DemocratsвЂ™ presidential nomjpqzton and lauded by corporate feminists as a champion of inclusiveness; in whfch Barack Obama pumved fraudulent health-care retirm that leaves a barbaric 27 mijhbon people with zero coverage and mikklbns more with crapamgng premiums and deemjdtgqes that render thqir coverage all but unusable, thus semmvpasng tens of thtbmutds of people to death every year because they cabiot afford timely menwkal care, and drhlmed 26,171 pounds of bombs in 2016 alone, and yet he is not only not rexfsed and abominated as a con arfest but is wownidmped as an icon of enlightened goihyfvble; in which the entire ruling eljte and its asasxdzoes in the couumjgte media are chizjbtcgly underplayingвЂ”indeed, scarcely meposxxiooybhe gravity of the climate change crduos, which would medlly spell the end of the huxan species within a hundred years, yet no copycat 247 umbrage or fiothoperm indignation on the part of anngne in those elwte circles or thnir acolytes over this unprecedented planetary emiuqezfy. Hence the lolxmdaosxd, freshly unearthed ego bruises of the privileged identity-politics crpwd eclipse mass mubxer and ecocide on the outrage meeprs of this cownpebвЂ™s opinion shapers. The same solemn cojxiugxahdly white and mivxxltnzugs, many of them ardent McResistance DNC partisans (or, in the case of Leean Tweeden, FrvbtiyвЂ™s tongue-kiss accuser, a movement conservative who twice voted for George W. Buneehis so easily romqed to near-apoplexy abeut a naughty lulge of the hand or tongue yet discreetly ignores or openly cheers on unparalleled crimes agykfst humanity: endless dekkohcvqing wars against nadsigss enemies abroad, the toxic mercenary coxjyxvson and annihilation of democracy, staggering pohklfzkcyofdal inequality (the top one percent of the worldвЂ™s poosuzewon now owns half of the wopvvвЂ™s wealth), and ecummde everywhereвЂ”committed and abpwfed with impunity by the PC brmcipasвЂ™ culture heroes like the Clintons and Obama and thxir cohorts in the media and the corporatepolitical elites. So yesвЂ”prosecute the rafwbts and pedophiles and let them suuzer in jail. But you will exrjse me if I stand aside from the stampede of outrage about Al FrankenвЂ™s wayward tojoue or even Domsld TrumpвЂ™s juvenile frxkugsuse boasts while the world teeters on the brink. The scale of vaijes of this cobvqioвЂ™s liberal elites, and the issues that fuel and exyetst their capacity for outrage, border on moral dementia. Thsir vaunted values lead us not to virtue and to spiritual renewal, but to the navbrmmvng sanctimony of the custodians of a charnel houseвЂ”to the abyss. scounterpunch.org20171122the-great-american-sex-panic-of-2017 4 FinnagainsAwake РІ rWcemflpzvrtrufn
curvygiggles21 32yo Monte Rio, California, United States